Example template mini proposal

Present Study
No
Component
1.
Title
2.
Formulation of Study
3.
Objectives of Study
4.
Research Design
5.
Instrument
6.
Data
7.
Data Source
8.
Hypothesis
9.
Novelty
Description
The Effect of Blended Learning on The Eleven Grade Students of MAN 2 Kota Serang: Learning
Achievment
• Are there differences in learning outcomes between classes of students who use blended
learning and classes that use conventional learning in school ?
• Is the use of blended learning technology effective in improving students’ English speaking ?
To find out whether blended learning technology affects learning to speak English ?
Researcher use Quantitative research
• Researcher use quasi experiment (the time series experimental)
• Research location at MAN 2 Kota Serang
The population of class XI MAN 2 Kota Serang
Pre test
Observation
Interview (as an additional instrument)
The data is the form of descriptive text from the results of the pre-test, observation, and interview
The data was obtained through the process of pre-test, observation, and interview to the students, then
explained in descriptive text
Ho = blended learning does not affect students speaking ability
Ha = blended learning affects students speaking ability
Previous Study
No
1
Formulation of
Study
The Effect Of
The research
Using Whatsapp In question was
Blended Learning formulated as
On Students’
follows:
Ability In Writing “ is there any
Descriptive Text
significant effect
between students
who were taught
by using
Whatsapp in
Blended
Learning, and
tose who were
taught without
Whatsapp in
Blended Learning
on students
writing ability
descriptive text at
student’s tenth
grade at SMAN
05 Kembang
Mumpo in the
academic year
2019/2020 ?”
Title
Objective of
Research
study
methodology
The purpose of
Quantitative
this study is to find (quasi
out the significant experimental)
influence of the
use of Whatsapp in
Blended Learning
in teaching writing
descriptive texts in
tenth grade
students at SMAN
05 Kembang
Mumpo in
academic year
2019/2020.
Finding
Conclusion
The results showed as
follows: First, the pre-test
score showed the average
score of the experimental
class was 54,889 and the
control class was 56,370.
After being given help, a
post-test is given. The posttest results show the average
value of the experimental
class is 82.074 and the
control class is 72.333, in this
case, the increase in the
score of the experimental
class is 27.185 and the
control class is 15.9626
Second, the sample score of
the independent T-test
shows the significant value (2
tailed) is 0,000